From 0f4bf784bef501a19365f9b37d520b898e16c97c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: fyodor Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 23:24:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] commented out an hp-pjl empty softmatch which was causing problems for other services as described by Tom Sellers in this thread: http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2010/q2/753 --- nmap-service-probes | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/nmap-service-probes b/nmap-service-probes index e6ad2b44d..b202dfdb4 100644 --- a/nmap-service-probes +++ b/nmap-service-probes @@ -8886,8 +8886,12 @@ match hp-pjl m|^@PJL INFO ID\r?\n([\w\d _-]+)\r?\n| p/$1/ d/printer/ # Some respond with blank info match hp-pjl m|@PJL\x20INFO\x20ID\r?\n\r?\n| d/printer/ -# We don't want to send a bunch more probes that will be printed -softmatch hp-pjl m|^| i/hp-pjl probe got something back/ +# COMMENTING THIS SOFTMATCH OUT. It is meant to stop causing a bunch +# of extra printing of probes against PJL ports (those port numbers +# are excluded by default anyway), but it caused problems described in +# this thread: http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2010/q2/753 +# But it might be useful for people doing pjl testing specifically. +# softmatch hp-pjl m|^| i/hp-pjl probe got something back/ ##############################NEXT PROBE############################## # Citrix MetaFrame application discovery service