From 235dab9f244d16e7eaf7e0858ce8a1614580de9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: david <david@e0a8ed71-7df4-0310-8962-fdc924857419>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 05:58:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix an array allocation; we were allocating a multiple of the
 size of a struct, not the size of a pointer to it. Over-allocating did no
 harm beyond wasting some memory.

---
 osscan2.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/osscan2.cc b/osscan2.cc
index b2700f2d0..0ab8be9e6 100644
--- a/osscan2.cc
+++ b/osscan2.cc
@@ -2750,7 +2750,7 @@ HostOsScanInfo::HostOsScanInfo(Target *t, OsScanInfo *OsSI) {
   target = t;
   OSI = OsSI;
 
-  FPs = (FingerPrint **) safe_zalloc(o.maxOSTries() * sizeof(FingerPrint));
+  FPs = (FingerPrint **) safe_zalloc(o.maxOSTries() * sizeof(FingerPrint *));
   FP_matches = (FingerPrintResults *) safe_zalloc(o.maxOSTries() * sizeof(FingerPrintResults));
   timedOut = false;
   isCompleted = false;