From 3731a3cb298c651f71f3cea2fb7ba9d0d0008372 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: david Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:44:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix an inaccurate comment. We care about closed UDP ports for OS detection, not open. --- FingerPrintResults.cc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/FingerPrintResults.cc b/FingerPrintResults.cc index b43d52331..34d9363b9 100644 --- a/FingerPrintResults.cc +++ b/FingerPrintResults.cc @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ const char *FingerPrintResults::OmitSubmissionFP() { if (osscan_closedudpport < 0 && !o.udpscan) { /* If we didn't get a U1 response, that might be just - because we didn't search for an open port rather than + because we didn't search for an closed port rather than because this OS doesn't respond to that sort of probe. So we don't print FP if U1 response is lacking AND no UDP scan was performed. */