From 78c3a83c878290d9dc990ec79f876a29b7e657fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: michael <michael@e0a8ed71-7df4-0310-8962-fdc924857419>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:50:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added an error message for when the user specifies a
 device(-e) that doesnt have a route to the target IP in windows.

This was caught by another error message later on, but it was ambiguous and unrelated to the actual problem.
---
 targets.cc | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/targets.cc b/targets.cc
index 0768da682..91cde9547 100644
--- a/targets.cc
+++ b/targets.cc
@@ -521,6 +521,11 @@ do {
 	if (rnfo.direct_connect) {
 	  hs->hostbatch[hidx]->setDirectlyConnected(true);
 	} else {
+	  //if the user selected an interface with the -e command that has no route to their target
+	  //this error message will catch it.
+	  if(rnfo.nexthop.ss_family!=AF_INET || rnfo.nexthop.ss_family!=AF_INET6 ){
+		fatal("%s: can not find route for non-directly conected device %s.", __func__, hs->hostbatch[hidx]->NameIP());
+	  }
 	  hs->hostbatch[hidx]->setDirectlyConnected(false);
 	  hs->hostbatch[hidx]->setNextHop(&rnfo.nexthop, 
 					  sizeof(rnfo.nexthop));