mirror of
https://github.com/nmap/nmap.git
synced 2025-12-06 04:31:29 +00:00
Move some todo items to done
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
|
||||
DONE:
|
||||
|
||||
o [Zenmap] Combine parallel timed-out hops into one node in the
|
||||
topology view. http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2012/q1/82 has a patch,
|
||||
however it doesn't handle the case of two or more consecutive
|
||||
timeouts.
|
||||
|
||||
o If Nmap uses a "tcpwrapped" port to do fingerprinting on, OS detection
|
||||
might give false matches/results. Since it doesn't really matter which
|
||||
open port gets chosen, we should move onto another open port if we
|
||||
notice "tcpwrapped".
|
||||
|
||||
o Implement an --exclude-ports option. See
|
||||
http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2012/q1/275
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -58,14 +58,6 @@ o GSOC 2014 student Jay will be looking at these items:
|
||||
o Consider using a binary decision diagram for --exclude list to make
|
||||
it more efficient for large exclude lists. See
|
||||
http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2012/q4/420.
|
||||
o [Zenmap] Combine parallel timed-out hops into one node in the
|
||||
topology view. http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2012/q1/82 has a patch,
|
||||
however it doesn't handle the case of two or more consecutive
|
||||
timeouts.
|
||||
o If Nmap uses a "tcpwrapped" port to do fingerprinting on, OS detection
|
||||
might give false matches/results. Since it doesn't really matter which
|
||||
open port gets chosen, we should move onto another open port if we
|
||||
notice "tcpwrapped".
|
||||
|
||||
o Adopt an issue tracking system for Nmap and related tools. We
|
||||
should probably look at our needs and options and then decide on and
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user