From c29429ecb584bcc3d4a7162cdc192ac5e6dae5e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: fyodor Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:34:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- docs/TODO | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/TODO b/docs/TODO index edee4c813..ebf8cc9ac 100644 --- a/docs/TODO +++ b/docs/TODO @@ -85,6 +85,17 @@ o [NSE] Consider integrating HP Laserjet print PJL status-setting updated during the thread). Also, see this thread: http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2009/q3/0092.html +o The Nmap refguide (http://nmap.org/book/man-performance.html) says + "The --max-parallelism option is sometimes set to one to prevent Nmap + from sending more than one probe at a time to hosts. This can be + useful in combination with --scan-delay (discussed later), although + the latter usually serves the purpose well enough by itself." But + when you actually try it: + # ./nmap --max-parallelism 1 --scan-delay 10 scanme.nmap.org + You can't use --max-parallelism with --scan-delay. + QUITTING! + We need to either make that work or adjust the documentation. + o Consider the open proxy scripts more carefully - How should we test whether the proxy attempt was successful? Right now we look for a google-specific Server header after trying to